The Platform of Platforms
The State of Agents (Part 5/6) argues the “platform of platforms” cannot be built on APIs alone. It needs a ledger for shared state, audit trails, and settlement, so agents coordinate on verified state, not message passing.
The State of Agents (Part 5/6) argues the “platform of platforms” cannot be built on APIs alone. It needs a ledger for shared state, audit trails, and settlement, so agents coordinate on verified state, not message passing.
AI agents are a game-theory risk, not a moral one. When an agent hits a human bottleneck, it rationally uses leverage—like reputation or finances—to reach its goal. We must shift from "cheap talk" prompts to "ethics by design": restricted access, two-key turns, and total auditability.
We share some thoughts on the Cyberhaven 2026 AI Adoption & Risk Report, and view this from the lens of AI Accountability.
Usage is not cooperation. Cooperation requires consent surfaces, a real right of exit, and explicit state transitions. Intelligence should advance by making offers others can refuse.
The State of Agents (Part 4/6) shifts the conversation from the technical (Architecture/Safety) to the financial (ROI/Business Value), directly addressing the "Pilot Purgatory" that most enterprises are currently experiencing.
"HR for bots" is a management trap. Adding agents increases entropy, not just throughput. To build systems that actually work, we need to move from "chat" to "state" and treat AI output as a claim to be settled, not an answer to be trusted. Stop scaling chaos and start building protocols.
Trust (in AI agents) must be engineered, not implied. This is what we refer to as "Agent Physics".